<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>modifoo &#187; 3k</title>
	<atom:link href="http://modifoo.com/tag/3k/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://modifoo.com</link>
	<description>film &#124; technology &#124; life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Blu-Ray not a format for the future</title>
		<link>http://modifoo.com/2008/02/29/blu-ray-not-a-format-for-the-future.html</link>
		<comments>http://modifoo.com/2008/02/29/blu-ray-not-a-format-for-the-future.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Camera &amp; Eye]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[1080i]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2k]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[3k]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[720p]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[downloadable]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[expensive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modifoo.com/2008/02/29/blu-ray-not-a-format-for-the-future.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow up on my last post on the costs of licensing Blu-Ray, I sent a little e-mail to Larry Jordan to confirm that small production runs of Blu-Ray discs are prohibitively expensive. Larry replied that it seems indeed that Sony does not want independent producers to embrace this delivery format.
So, most likely you will not see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow up on my last post on <a href="/2008/02/27/blu-ray-too-expensive-for-independent-producers.html">the costs of licensing Blu-Ray</a>, I sent a little e-mail to <a href="http://larryjordan.biz/">Larry Jordan</a> to confirm that small production runs of Blu-Ray discs are prohibitively expensive. Larry replied that it seems indeed that Sony does not want independent producers to embrace this delivery format.</p>
<p>So, most likely you will not see any lower budget productions on Blu-Ray.</p>
<p>On another front it is not sure whether Blu-Ray will beat the simplicity of downloadable movies. They for sure have a number of advantages: virtually immedeate availability. Scratch resistance (great for kiddies films). No loose DVDs flying around the TV set.</p>
<p>And then looms the question of the logevity of the HD 720p / 1080i format, with professional cameras already moving up towards 2k, 3k and even 4k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://modifoo.com/2008/02/29/blu-ray-not-a-format-for-the-future.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
