production

You are currently browsing articles tagged production.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or get my latest posts directly in your mailbox. Thanks for coming to the Foo!

A while ago, I wrote about the Red camera project. Now they have not only released some test films, but also a price list. But first a little note on the test films. Our editing station has two 24-inch monitors. Viewing the 1080p (not i!) resolution film fills out the whole screen. Every single pixel. Plain amazing! (just for comparison, here’s a link to a framegrab from a HDV camcorder) And this camera is capable of up to 2540p - i.e. more than 4 times the resolution of 1080p. (Framegrab, Framegrab 2-you see the structure of the mascara!)

Now I am really looking forward to trying out this baby. Luckily a guy I know has pre-ordered one, so hopefully I’ll be able to do some tests. But I am sure there’ll be lots of buzz around when this camera hits the sets.

¿Quanta costa?

But how much does this miracle of tech-specs cost? Well, let’s have a look at their price list, and put together a nice package to get us up and running: Read the rest of this entry »

— Sometimes we have failed, but at least we have learned from it.

— We haven’t failed, we just haven’t succeeded.

Such went a conversation I had with my wife today. And with this I want to salute all people who stick to their ideals, and don’t get discouraged by life, trouble, problems, clients, money (lack of), paperwork (lack of lack of), tiredness (plenty of). The last days and weeks have been very busy, crazy and exhausting. But we stick to our guns, and I prefer being tired from working long hours for something I belive in, rather than being tired from working 8 hours for something I couldn’t care less about.

Get up, stand up. Don’t give up the fight.

Have a good week.

Over at the Apple discussion board, I stumbled upon this gem:

I’m a film editor who’s had the privilege to work on $100 movies to $100 million movies.

Story is king. If your story is working, and crafted well, and paced properly, you can get away with almost whatever you want. For instance, when I cut scenes, I cut for performance… I don’t toss out takes because the glass of water was full in take one but empty in another. 9 times out of ten, even the seasoned filmmakers I’m working with never see the continuity errors because the performances are working.

Occasionally I work with first time directors, helping them with their first short. I see two main mistakes. First, they think that if someone knows how to operate [an editing station], that they are an editor. This is simply not true. I know how to use a chisel, but there is no way [...] I could sculpt the David. Editing is the same: knowing what buttons to push is the least important part of editing. Knowing how to tell a story well is everything. In fact, I know one Oscar winning editor who spent many years never touching the equipment at all. She chose the cut points, and had her assistants do the physical cutting.

The second main mistake amateur filmmakers make, IMO, is that they are not vicious enough when cutting their material. Every single frame of film you project should be conveying new information to the audience. If it’s not, get it out.

The same applies to the craft of cinematography. On discussion boards around film-making I often read questions from wanting-to-be directors on what camera they should buy, which lens they should use. Ocasionally I take the time to point out that if they want to become directors, they should not concern themselves about equipment. They should spend all the time they can on the story, developing the characters, working with the actors to achieve his/her creative vision.

Rather than buying a semi-professional camera, I advise to hire in a professional DP. S/he will not only bring superior equipment, but - most importantly - experience to the shoot. Take a good story and a knowlegdable DP, and you will have something in the cutting room to work with. Your chances of getting your film into a festival and ultimately to actually sell it, have tremendously increased.

Or you can spend all your money on a second-rate camera (never, ever believe the hype that the new HDV camera for $10.000 is as good as a $100.000 camera. But that is another blog…), and end up having to both direct and shoot on your first film. Not a good idea. Leave the technical worries to someone you can trust, and concentrate on your job: story telling.

Movie tip: Living in Oblivion by Tom DiCillo

internet tvI still have not figured out how youTube makes money, but the founders of Skype are about to launch their own offer.

[The service] has the codename The Venice Project. It will offer “near high-definition”, programmes supported by advertising, with tools for users to personalise their channels or discuss programmes with others.

[...] one person close to Warner Music confirmed it was using the service to create channels for some of its artists, including Paris Hilton

Will be interesting to see what their business model is. Near HD definetely sounds intriguing - but we have to see it first.

Read the rest of this entry »

White vortexRhed Pixel is one of those active companies, that do not mind giving away excellent, free advice. Over at the dv.com website (which also has useful infos for people shooting other formats) Richard Harrington contributes regularly with in-depth information.

At Photoshop for Video, you find some good tutorials on, well, you know.

Read the rest of this entry »

Sometimes it just does happen. A far away production company needs some pictures from Norway. They find and book us. The shooting day comes nearer, and still I have not received details as to where and when and what. Internal warning lights start flashing, if slowly. Then, the night before the shoot, an e-mail arrives with a “sorry, but our client has cancelled”.
That means cancelling (on very short notice) equipment I had planned on renting. Which is not the smartest move, reputation-wise. But it also means a day off. Well, let’s rephrase that one. A day that is suddenly awailable to do some of the things that have been waiting to be done, but were pushed to the to-do-list instead.
So the question is, how do I charge the far away production company? I know how it is to be in their shoes. They probably feel a bit embarassed as to having cancelled so late.
Since the cancellatin came less than 24 hours before the shoot, we would usually charge our expenses ocurred (but no less than 50% of the job quote). Do you feel this is too much / too little / just right?
Comments welcome.

« Older entries § Newer entries »